The decision by Cricket Australia to prevent Cameron Green and Cooper Connolly from bowling in the early stages of the 2026 season of the Indian Premier League has once again brought the issue of workload management in franchise cricket into sharp focus.

Both Australian all-rounders are participating in the IPL purely as specialist batters while they recover from stress-related lower back injuries. The directive from Cricket Australia aims to ensure the duo gradually rebuild their bowling workloads and avoid aggravating existing injuries. However, the situation has sparked debate within the cricketing fraternity about whether overseas boards should impose such restrictions when players are contracted by IPL franchises as all-rounders.

While the Green and Connolly cases have drawn attention this season, it is not the first time overseas players have faced role limitations in the IPL due to injury management. In previous seasons, players like Ben Stokes and Mitchell Marsh have entered the tournament after injury layoffs with restrictions on their bowling workloads. Similarly, Andre Russell has occasionally played purely as a batter for the Kolkata Knight Riders when managing knee issues despite being signed as an all-rounder.

Such cases underline the growing influence of national boards in safeguarding their players’ fitness amid a packed global cricket calendar. For Cricket Australia, the priority lies in protecting players from recurring stress fractures, one of the most common and serious injuries for fast bowlers. Green, who previously underwent surgery after suffering a back stress fracture in 2024, has only recently returned to competitive cricket. Connolly too is recovering from a similar injury.

“Managing bowling loads is a key part of rehabilitation for fast bowlers returning from back injuries,” a Cricket Australia official said. “The focus is on ensuring the players build their workload safely rather than rushing them back too quickly.”

Also read: Most IPL captains disagree with Impact Player rule

The Australian board is expected to allow Green to gradually resume bowling during the tournament, while Connolly’s return to full all-round duties could take longer. The approach taken by the Board of Control for Cricket in India has historically been different. Indian players are monitored closely through the National Cricket Academy, but once cleared medically they are generally allowed to participate fully in the IPL without role-based restrictions.

For instance, players like Hardik Pandya and Jasprit Bumrah have used the IPL as a platform to regain match fitness after injuries once they were declared fit to play. The BCCI’s philosophy has largely been that players either participate fully or are ruled out entirely until they are completely match-ready.

For IPL franchises, however, such restrictions can complicate team balance. All-rounders are among the most valuable assets in T20 cricket because they provide flexibility in both batting and bowling departments. When a player signed as an all-rounder is restricted to batting duties, teams are forced to rethink combinations and bowling resources.

Despite the challenges, experts believe workload management will increasingly shape how international players participate in franchise leagues. As cricket’s calendar grows more crowded and injury prevention becomes a priority, national boards are likely to continue exercising caution — even in tournaments as high-profile as the IPL.

By Joe Williams