Critical reengagement with his work will keep Ray relevant: Dhritiman Chaterji
0 4 min 11 mths


Actor Dhritiman Chaterji, known for his powerful performances in several of Satyajit Rayโ€™s seminal films, on Friday (May 2, 2025) observed that the most meaningful tribute to the iconic filmmaker would be a critical re-engagement with his body of work – emphasis, he said, on the word โ€œcriticallyโ€.

Speaking to The Hindu on the occasion of Rayโ€™s birth anniversary, Mr. Chaterji, who starred in Pratidwandi, Ganashatru, and Agantuk, reflected on the complex legacy of a filmmaker widely regarded as one of the most influential voices in world cinema.

Asked how he would assess Rayโ€™s stature among Indian filmmakers, Mr. Chaterji said he was cautious of evaluative rankings, particularly in the realm of art. โ€œI have always been wary of โ€˜who-is-the-bestโ€™ type of comparisons in the arts. It depends so much on the vision of the creator as well as the sensibility, ideology, and context of the viewer. That said, Rayโ€™s multidisciplinary capabilities – in literature, music, the visual arts, criticism – probably contributed to his extraordinary achievements in cinema,โ€ he said.

โ€œI would stop short of calling him the greatest filmmaker in India,โ€ he added. โ€œTo do so would be intellectually lazy and unfair to other brilliant directors. In any case, for me, such a term is somewhat meaningless. What I most enjoyed about my time with him were the long conversations – many of which extended far beyond cinema.โ€

At a time when social media platforms were inundated with glowing tributes to the Oscar-honoured auteur, Mr. Chaterji struck a more reflective note. โ€œI donโ€™t know if turning his birthday into an annual ritual, almost a puja, marked by unquestioning adulation, truly helps in keeping his legacy alive. His relevance, to me, lies in two things: a consistent effort to place his work – directly or indirectly – within a broader social and political context; and a deep-seated respect for the intelligence of his audience.โ€

Recalling a memorable moment from Ganashatru, in which he played a character with ambiguous moral shades – a departure from his earlier roles – Mr. Chaterji shared a quiet anecdote that offered insight into Rayโ€™s working style. โ€œRay was not one to offer exuberant praise. A simple โ€˜Fine, letโ€™s move onโ€™ was generally the highest compliment. During Ganashatru, I was unsure, and finally asked him, โ€˜Manikda, is it going alright?โ€™ Without looking up from what he was reading, he replied, โ€˜If itโ€™s not alright, Iโ€™ll let you knowโ€™. That was praise enough, as far as I was concerned.โ€

On a lighter note, Mr. Chaterji also recounted a moment of personal embarrassment from the set of their last film together. โ€œThere was a mix-up with the call time, and I arrived late to find Ray, Utpal Dutt, and the crew waiting. Ray simply said, โ€˜Late on the very first day?โ€™ That quiet reprimand was enough for me to want to disappear into the background,โ€ he said, adding that he could not recall Ray ever losing his temper on set. โ€œHe was, among other things, an excellent human resource manager. His sets functioned with calm and efficiency.โ€

As Rayโ€™s legacy continues to inspire generations of filmmakers and cinephiles, Mr. Chaterjiโ€™s reflections serve as a reminder of the importance of critical appreciation over rote reverence – of engaging with the filmmaker not just as a cultural icon, but as a thinker deeply rooted in his time and society.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *